----- Forwarded message from Sam Trenholme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Sam Trenholme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Updated MaraDNS roadmap
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:19:14 -0600
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Forwarded-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Forwarded-For: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=X358GAjE87rz9msaMWEFkYT/wUUuRaFnIQSSIRIg3eAoJB4Q1tE2I6cbAD8PsdnPedW3lHWliDbf5t/2GyC4ru7GasEHzHuYLyKJx4sc7v924g2jf1A0ArFhEcxhOF4zmO7oK3k3ZCxpT/uc9g5gvgVUN3YDXtgmW6qkKXkXnWg=
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on
spunkymail-mx4.dreamhost.comWhen I first saw it, I tried to reproduce the bug, but couldn't :( This was when I was working three jobs and basically nnon-stop from 7am to 7pm, so I didn't have time to look at it further. It may be caused because he's using upstream_servers I'll try to find time in a day or two to look at it, before my trip. I may have to test it with the Windows version of MaraDNS from a cyber cafe. I think fixing bugs is far more important than features; a DNS server should be simple and stable. - Sam 2006/11/29, Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >Good to see you hard at work on Maradns. > >Did you see this bug report? >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397064 > >Any ideas? > > >Saludos, > ----- End forwarded message -----
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
