Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank!
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended
ii texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essential programs
and files
ii texlive-base-bin
Hi Frank!
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended
ii texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essential programs
and
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5)
Oops, I forgot to run bin/fixlatex on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't
provide an s function like the other debiandoc2* commands. It's in
Hi Danai, hi Jens,
Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can build it well in my etch system but pbuilder still has issues with
zh-tw:
debiandoc2latexpdf: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly
debiandoc2latexpdf: rerun with the -v option to found out why
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ii texlive-base-bin 2005.dfsg.2-5 TeX Live: Essential binaries
ii texlive-pdfetex 2005.dfsg.2-5 TeX Live: pdfTeX
[12
! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [max level recursion of virtual fonts=10].
to be read again
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:20:11AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
debiandoc-sgml and
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:18:07AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5)
Oops, I forgot to run bin/fixlatex on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't
provide an s function like the other
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:18:07AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5)
Oops, I forgot to run bin/fixlatex on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't
provide
Hi Frank!
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended
ii texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essential programs and
files
ii texlive-base-bin 2005.dfsg.2-5 TeX Live: Essential binaries
ii
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debiandoc2latex -s sed_script
as it can be used with debiandoc2latex{dvi,ps,pdf}
I added it to CVS. We need to test it and debug it.
But why we need it. since if it is debiandoc2latex, then
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
debiandoc-sgml and debian-reference packages have been released.
Thanks. I uploaded debiandoc-sgml and one more package today.
I
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will do debian-reference later.(once debiandoc-sgml hit unstable)
I have tried this, and there are still issues.
I can confirm this with a pbuilder build.
First of all, debian-reference as
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
debiandoc-sgml and debian-reference packages have been released.
Thanks. I uploaded
From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5)
Oops, I forgot to run bin/fixlatex on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't
provide an s function like the other debiandoc2* commands. It's in
my TODO list.
Anyway, I've reuploaded a correct
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
debiandoc-sgml and debian-reference packages have been released.
Thanks. I uploaded debiandoc-sgml and one more package today.
I will do debian-reference later.(once
From: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Danai SAE-HAN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061109 19:41]:
Package: maint-guide
Same problem as debian-reference and debian-zh-faq, this time in the
japanese version (I already mentioned this in the bug report to #397676)
OK, that's noted. It
* Danai SAE-HAN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061109 19:41]:
Package: maint-guide
Same problem as debian-reference and debian-zh-faq, this time in the
japanese version (I already mentioned this in the bug report to #397676)
OK, that's noted. It probably only needs a switch from the HBF fonts
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have the source, so if you could test pdflatex with test.tex?
You can find it here:
http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/test.tex
Which fonts (or other things) do I need to have installed? With
latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bkai00mp installed,
Hi Frank e.a.!
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ohla! It seems that Taco from NTG got a fix!
http://lists.ffii.org/pipermail/cjk/2006-November/001792.html
It contains a patch for pdftex.web.
I hope that this will fix our issue with
Hi Danai,
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ohla! It seems that Taco from NTG got a fix!
http://lists.ffii.org/pipermail/cjk/2006-November/001792.html
It contains a patch for pdftex.web.
I hope that this will fix our issue with DDP.
If I understood the discussion on the pdftex
clone 397571 -1
retitle -1 Number of fonts supported by pdftex is limited
clone -1 -2
reassign -1 tetex-bin
reassign -2 texlive-bin
thanks
I think the number of fonts is limited thing deserves a separate bug.
If I'm not mistaken, most of the other issues with CJK are either fixed
in
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:34:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
I think the number of fonts is limited thing deserves a separate bug.
Indeed.
If I'm not mistaken, most of the other issues with CJK are either fixed
in debian-reference or in debiandoc-sgml, but this one is not.
I'm not sure. I
Hi Frank,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:34:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
clone 397571 -1
retitle -1 Number of fonts supported by pdftex is limited
clone -1 -2
reassign -1 tetex-bin
reassign -2 texlive-bin
thanks
I think the number of fonts is limited thing deserves a separate bug.
And
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the number of fonts is limited thing deserves a separate bug.
If I'm not mistaken, most of the other issues with CJK are either fixed
in debian-reference or in debiandoc-sgml, but this one is not.
All is fixed, except indeed for the arithmetic
tags 399897 -pending
clone 399897 -1
reassign -1 texlive-base-bin
severity -1 important
thanks
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:34:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
clone 397571 -1
retitle -1 Number of fonts supported by pdftex is limited
clone -1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 397571 patch
thanks
Looks like Build-Dependency needs to be updated to latex-cjk-all from
cjk-latex. I attach a patch which changes it, and I'm preparing an NMU.
Matt
- --
Matthew Johnson
http://www.matthew.ath.cx/
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Matthew Johnson wrote:
Looks like Build-Dependency needs to be updated to latex-cjk-all from
cjk-latex. I attach a patch which changes it, and I'm preparing an NMU.
Turns out that a. The build-deps need more updating (patch
tags 397571 - patch
tags 397571 pending
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:56:57PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
Looks like Build-Dependency needs to be updated to latex-cjk-all from
cjk-latex. I attach a patch which changes it, and I'm preparing an NMU.
Also we need to adjust fonts to
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I am curious if you were successful in building just with your patch.
If so, that is a news.
Sadly not. The first problems were solved with said patch, but it turns
out there were more when I was building the patched package. It takes a
while to build,
Well, it could be a pdflatex bug: Hartmut Henkel jsut found out that
pdftex apparently has a limitation of 255 fonts. This might be
problematic for languages which use a lot of font planes, like CJK.
See http://lists.ffii.org/pipermail/cjk/2006-November/001785.html and
further on the CJK mailing
Ohla! It seems that Taco from NTG got a fix!
http://lists.ffii.org/pipermail/cjk/2006-November/001792.html
It contains a patch for pdftex.web.
I hope that this will fix our issue with DDP.
Cheers!
Danai SAE-HAN
韓達耐
--
題目:《讀嚴子陵傳》
作者:楊萬里（１１２７－１２０６）
客星何補漢中興，空有清風冷似冰。
早遣阿瞞移漢鼎，人間何處有嚴陵！
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:27:09PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
It's created with bg5conv, which replaces all Big5 glyphs with control
sequences that TeX can read. Nowadays you don't need this anymore:
the CJK package is smart enough to do all the stuff itself.
I am confised here.
You say sed
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:40:41AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
$ debiandoc2latex -l ja reference.ja.sgml
The result won't run with latex because it misses the HBF fonts.
For Japanese, there's a much better way now to get nice fonts: the use
of DNP Type1 fonts. You will need a slight change
,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:00:14AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Indeed. /usr/share/perl5/DebianDoc_SGML/Locale/zh_TW.Big5/LaTeX
should mention bkai instead of just kai.
--- LaTeX~ 2006-11-10 00:55:42.0 +0100
+++ LaTeX 2006-11-10 00:55:54.485488758 +0100
@@ -11,7 +11,7
From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:27:09PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
It's created with bg5conv, which replaces all Big5 glyphs with control
sequences that TeX can read. Nowadays you don't need this anymore:
the CJK package is smart enough to do all the stuff
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: debiandoc-sgml
Problem: update to latex-cjk and better CJK support
Appointed to Danai.
File to check: release-notes.ja.sgml
Package: apt-howto
No problems. Reported by Frank.
Package: debian-reference
Problems. Reported
(I droped Lucas, as it becomes out of topic related to the FTBS. Osamu
and I are subscribed to the bug.)
Hi Danai,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:34:15AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Okay, I checked out the SGML-generated .tex file, and it seems very
much that Perl or something else misinterprets
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:08:54PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
(I droped Lucas, as it becomes out of topic related to the FTBS. Osamu
and I are subscribed to the bug.)
Hi Danai,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:34:15AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Okay, I checked out the SGML-generated .tex file,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This step isn't necessary (anymore): [...]
And use bkai instead of kai; [...]
This need to be fixed
/usr/share/perl5/DebianDoc_SGML/Locale/zh_TW.Big5/LaTeX
%locale = (
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:23:13PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
And use bkai instead of kai; kai is reserved for ugly HBF bitmap
fonts, and I haven't packaged them yet (I find them of little use,
except perhaps the CNS fonts).
Does this apply for zh_CN too?
From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This step isn't necessary (anymore): [...]
And use bkai instead of kai; [...]
This need to be fixed
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: debiandoc-sgml
Problem: update to latex-cjk and better CJK support
Appointed to Danai.
File to check: release-notes.ja.sgml
Package: apt-howto
No problems. Reported by Frank.
From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:08:54PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:34:15AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Okay, I checked out the SGML-generated .tex file, and it seems very
much that Perl or something else misinterprets some of the
From: Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:34:15AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Okay, I checked out the SGML-generated .tex file, and it seems very
much that Perl or something else misinterprets some of the CJK
characters.
The command I used to create the .tex file
Package: debian-reference
Version: 1.09-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
ln -sf zh-tw/hyperref-full.cfg
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:37:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: debian-reference
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
ln -sf zh-tw/hyperref-full.cfg hyperref.cfg
debiandoc2latexpdf -s
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This step isn't necessary (anymore): [...]
And use bkai instead of kai; [...]
The author or the SGML processor seem(s) to use \textasciicircum et
alii commands a lot; in my DVI it shows as plain textasciicircum.
[...]
I played with
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:41:35PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
apt-howto builds nicely. I'm currently checking all of them,
debian-zh-faq fails with nearly the exact same error.
The same is true for release-notes.ja.sgml from DDP CVS. I verified that
the encoding is OK.
Jens
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:10:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi Jens, Lucas, Danai, and of course Osamu!
It seems there are two unrelated issues:
...
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 3.0.0), debiandoc-sgml (= 1.1.94),
tetex-bin, tetex-extra, w3m (= 0.3) | w3m-ssl (= 0.3) | w3mmee (= 0.3),
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attaching an archive of all generated reference.zh-tw.* files,
including the LaTeX log. Danai, can you help with this?
I am afraid some encoding error may have commited recently. Can you
look into it. The souce is not UTF-8.
What is it supposed to
Oops, I think that the TeX file that I sent you in attachment isn't
bug-free: it shows \textasciitilde{} correctly but others like
\textbackslash incorrectly. I'll have to figure it out later tonight
or tomorrow.
Cheers
Danai SAE-HAN
韓達耐
--
題目:《登快閣》
作者:黃庭堅（１０４５－１１０５）
痴兒了卻公家事，快閣東西倚晚晴。
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attaching an archive of all generated reference.zh-tw.* files,
including the LaTeX log. Danai, can you help with this?
I am afraid some encoding error may have commited recently. Can you
look into it. The
Hi Danai!
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:23:13PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Nope, reference.zh-tw.tex-in doesn't use UTF-8, it's written in Big5.
reference.zh-tw.tex itself is made with bg5conv, and converts all
double-byte glyphs into TeX-readable strings; you can't read the
output with a
Okay, I checked out the SGML-generated .tex file, and it seems very
much that Perl or something else misinterprets some of the CJK
characters.
The command I used to create the .tex file was:
debiandoc2latex -l zh_TW.Big5 reference.zh-tw.sgml
Examples of these misinterpreted characters:
in
Okay, I checked out the SGML-generated .tex file, and it seems very
much that Perl or something else misinterprets some of the CJK
characters.
The command I used to create the .tex file was:
debiandoc2latex -l zh_TW.Big5 reference.zh-tw.sgml
Examples of these misinterpreted characters:
in
55 matches
Mail list logo
