Bug#398310: don't assemble all arrays on install

2006-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
severity 398310 important retitle 398310 let user choose when to start which array tags 398310 confirmed help thanks also sprach dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.13.0230 +0100]: i had 4 disks which i had experimented with sw raid10 on a few months back... i never zeroed the superblocks.

Bug#398310: Re: Bug#398310: don't assemble all arrays on install

2006-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.13.1116 +0100]: right, now i know that i should create an /etc/default/mdadm *before* i install mdadm... because unlike other packages, mdadm does potentially dangerous things just by installing it. i'll keep that in mind :) You could also

Bug#398310: Re: Bug#398310: don't assemble all arrays on install

2006-11-13 Thread dean gaudet
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.13.1116 +0100]: right, now i know that i should create an /etc/default/mdadm *before* i install mdadm... because unlike other packages, mdadm does potentially dangerous things just by installing

Bug#398310: don't assemble all arrays on install

2006-11-13 Thread dean gaudet
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, martin f krafft wrote: severity 398310 important retitle 398310 let user choose when to start which array tags 398310 confirmed help thanks also sprach dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.13.0230 +0100]: i had 4 disks which i had experimented with sw raid10 on a

Bug#398310: don't assemble all arrays on install

2006-11-12 Thread dean gaudet
Package: mdadm Version: 2.5.5-1 Severity: grave it's dangerous to generate an mdadm.conf and start running arrays automatically at install time! i nearly got bit by this. i marked this grave because there's a potential for data loss with the current install scripts. i had 4 disks which i had