clone 398771 -1
reassign -1 python-support 0.5.5
retitle -1 python-support should warn and not fail when some files can't be
byte-compiled
thanks
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
This bug, in my opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release with
etch. It breaks upgrades from
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
That file usually is a symlink to /etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py, a
configuration file. I'm not terribly convinced it should be compiled
at all, actually.
Alex, you did have the file
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:22:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
That file usually is a symlink to /etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py, a
configuration file. I'm not terribly convinced it
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I just checked, it is not a conffile.
... and not shipped by the package, but created by the postinst.
Which means this also breaks _new_ installs as far as I understand it
because if:
- mailman gets unpacked _before_
- python2.4 gets
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:55:15PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I just checked, it is not a conffile.
... and not shipped by the package, but created by the postinst.
Which means this also breaks _new_ installs as far as I understand it
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:41:15PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:55:15PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I just checked, it is not a conffile.
... and not shipped by the package, but created by the postinst.
Which
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Ah, I think I have it. We can remove the symlink in pre-rtupdate and
put it back in post-rtupdate. That takes care of python version
updates. Now, for new installs... Python will guaranteed be configured
before us, so indeed creating the symlink
severity 398771 serious
thanks
This bug, in my opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release with
etch. It breaks upgrades from sarge to etch, if I understand well.
There is probably verbiage in the policy / RC policy to support that,
but I'm too lazy to dig it out.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.9-2
Severity: important
Configuring python (2.4.4-1) ...
running python rtupdate hooks for python2.4...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 268, in ?
bytecompile_privatedir(basedir)
File
9 matches
Mail list logo
