On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:23:13AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
> > directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
> > problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
> T
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
> directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
> problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
Then please clarify this in t
severity 398922 important
thanks
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:39:48PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> According to the Debian Policy as well as the etch release policy (5 c
> in the latter document), packages are RC if they do not follow the FHS.
> advi installs architecture-independent TeX input file
Package: advi
Version: 1.6.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS violation
According to the Debian Policy as well as the etch release policy (5 c
in the latter document), packages are RC if they do not follow the FHS.
advi installs architecture-independent TeX input files in
/usr/lib/advi. T
4 matches
Mail list logo