On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:51:40PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>> In that case, it sounds more like a bug in initscripts to me?
> Sorry, I don't understand why you think it would be a bug in initscripts...
Because initscripts is the package checking the fstab for NFS file systems,
attempting to
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:45:42PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:40:57PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > Hi Mattia,
> >
> > Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > >
> > > is this with the current user-mode-linux package?
> > > I cant reproduce it here with uml 2.6.18, portmap 5-2
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:28:12PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>
>>Some more information: if I set my filesystem to noauto, everything goes
>>fine (rpc.statd is correctly registered) except that I have to mount it
>>manually after booting...
>
>
> In that case, it
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:28:12PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Some more information: if I set my filesystem to noauto, everything goes
> fine (rpc.statd is correctly registered) except that I have to mount it
> manually after booting...
In that case, it sounds more like a bug in initscripts t
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> it shouldn't make much of a difference.
> Anyway I still can't reproduce the problem even automounting an nfs
> partition. My fs has been built as etch and upgraded to sid, will try a
> sarge-to-etch-upgraded-fs later.
>
> what's the order of scripts in your
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:40:57PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >
> > is this with the current user-mode-linux package?
> > I cant reproduce it here with uml 2.6.18, portmap 5-21, nfs-common
> > 1:1.0.10-4 and a rootstrap generated sid filesystem.
>
> Th
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>
> This is with user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-1, portmap 5-21 and nfs-common
> 1.0.10-4. The UML system used to be a sarge system that I upgraded to
> etch. I have a NFS system in my /etc/fstab, which leads to early startup
> of portmap (don't know if this makes a difference).
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> is this with the current user-mode-linux package?
> I cant reproduce it here with uml 2.6.18, portmap 5-21, nfs-common
> 1:1.0.10-4 and a rootstrap generated sid filesystem.
This is with user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-1, portmap 5-21 and nfs-common
1.0.10-4. The
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:03:29AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 399523 nfs-common,portmap,user-mode-linux
> Bug#399523: rpc.statd[2058]: unable to register (statd, 1, udp).
is this with the current user-mode-linux package?
I
9 matches
Mail list logo
