Bug#400109: Can we downgrade severity to important on #400109?

2006-11-27 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
However, I would prefer it to be etch-ignored instead of set to 'important', since serious bugs are less likely to be ignored. With all due respect, tough toenails. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#400109: Can we downgrade severity to important on #400109?

2006-11-27 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
This bug does not have a major effect on the usability of the package so I am therefore resetting severity to normal. It will not be ignored. After the Sun JDK enters main (post etch), we will rebuild the package with it. Hopefully that will resolve the intermittent build failure. Jeff -- To

Bug#400109: Can we downgrade severity to important on #400109?

2006-11-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Re-added Cc to the BTS, hope you don't mind) On 26/11/06 at 22:13 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: It seems like you both agreed that Debian bug #400109 doesn't need to be fixed for Etch, can we downgrade the severity to important (not release critical) to get it off the RC bug-tracking