Bug#400121: Can't reproduce 400121 with libpcre3

2006-11-29 Thread Tom Parker
I've just been doing the test that Olivier Trichet mentioned with pcretest, with a file containing 30,000 Z's, and I don't get a crash. This is with libpcre3 6.7-1 on i386. Any more details on a good testcase for libpcre3? Tom Parker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tevp.net Illegitimus non

Bug#400121: Can't reproduce 400121 with libpcre3

2006-11-29 Thread Mark Baker
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:59:47PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote: I've just been doing the test that Olivier Trichet mentioned with pcretest, with a file containing 30,000 Z's, and I don't get a crash. This is with libpcre3 6.7-1 on i386. I can reproduce it with pcregrep; no idea why pcretest

Bug#400121: Can't reproduce 400121 with libpcre3

2006-11-29 Thread Tom Parker
Mark Baker wrote: On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:59:47PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote: I've just been doing the test that Olivier Trichet mentioned with pcretest, with a file containing 30,000 Z's, and I don't get a crash. This is with libpcre3 6.7-1 on i386. I can reproduce it with pcregrep; no idea

Bug#400121: Can't reproduce 400121 with libpcre3

2006-11-29 Thread Mark Baker
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote: about my system... where exactly does pcregrep crash? A stack trace would be nice. p4-7088:~for i in $(seq 1 8192); do echo -n Z file; done p4-7088:~pcregrep '(.)*' file Segmentation fault Running it under gdb, using the copy in the

Bug#400121: Can't reproduce 400121 with libpcre3

2006-11-29 Thread Tom Parker
Mark Baker wrote: There is a limit recursion feature of PCRE, which the calling program could use. There appears to be two options here: 1) Punt back to Konqueror, and get them (or whatever they're calling that uses libpcre3 - note that libpcre3 is *not* in the dependancies of konqueror