Steve, Peter, Noèl, Eloy?
manty also, if you come up with a patch..:-)
A build-conflict with the -dev package should be sufficient, shouldn't it?
I have a package that's ready with this change only. See SVN.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:11:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Santiago Garcia Mantinan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If FAM was really not intended I think we should disable it on our config
and upload with high urgency to get a version without FAM to testing ASAP.
A discussion we had
Quoting Santiago Garcia Mantinan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If FAM was really not intended I think we should disable it on our config
and upload with high urgency to get a version without FAM to testing ASAP.
A discussion we had yesterday on IRC with Steve, lead to the
conclusion that this bug is
Hi, I believe your bug got too late as the new samba has hit testing today,
for what I saw FAM may not be a wanted feature, it is not listed on the
build dependencies and in fact arches other than i386, like amd64 for
example, don't seem to have a dependency on FAM.
If FAM was really not intended
4 matches
Mail list logo
