Bug#400737: proftpd-dfsg: is it really necessary to rename the source package when removing RFCs?

2006-11-28 Thread Marc Haber
Package: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.0-14 Severity: wishlist Is it really necessary to rename the source package when removing RFCs? Other packages only add dfsg to the upstream version number, which has the advantage of not breaking source package based monitoring mechanisms. Greetings Marc -- S

Bug#400737: proftpd-dfsg: is it really necessary to rename the source package when removing RFCs?

2006-11-29 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, > Is it really necessary to rename the source package when removing RFCs? > > Other packages only add dfsg to the upstream version number, which has > the advantage of not breaking source package based monitoring > mechanisms. Indeed, please change this back, preferably for etch. It is expl