Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Sam Morris
reopen 400752 ! thanks Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper modules in Debian. -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Sam Morris wrote: Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper modules in Debian. if the mainainer re-appears, i'll add ndiswrapper. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet:

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:25 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Sam Morris wrote: Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper modules in Debian. if the mainainer re-appears, i'll add ndiswrapper. Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Sam Morris wrote: Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel has a bouncing email address. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet:

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Sam Morris wrote: Right, but who is Kel--just the bug submitter? I would have submitted a bug myself if I didn't notice this one already in the BTS. Kel is co-maintainer of ndiswrapper and uses his broken email address not just for reporting bugs but also to maintain his packages. It seemed

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:50 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Sam Morris wrote: Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel has a bouncing email address. Right, but who is Kel--just the bug submitter? I would have submitted a bug

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Andres Salomon
Daniel Baumann wrote: Sam Morris wrote: Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel has a bouncing email address. Sorry, that's my fault; he has updated packages for me to sponsor, but I just haven't had time. Anyways, try

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:45 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: Daniel Baumann wrote: Sam Morris wrote: Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel has a bouncing email address. Sorry, that's my fault; he has updated

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-02-12 Thread Andres Salomon
Sam Morris wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:45 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: Daniel Baumann wrote: Sam Morris wrote: Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel has a bouncing email address. Sorry, that's my fault; he has

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-01-06 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, ndiswrapper was already heavily discussed if it belongs to main or to contrib. The result is, that it's still in main. I do not think that it is the task of the kernel-team to judge about this /on the conglomeration package/. If the kernel-team disagrees about having ndiswrapper beeing in

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-01-06 Thread Daniel Baumann
maximilian attems wrote: and who gets *stupid* unparsable oops reports! ...which gets reassigned to the source-package. yes i disagree. the only use of ndiswrapper to run proprietary junk. so it's a clear fit to contrib. feel free to re-start discussion where ever it is appropriate (but

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-01-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote: ndiswrapper was already heavily discussed if it belongs to main or to contrib. The result is, that it's still in main. I do not think that it is the task of the kernel-team to judge about this /on the conglomeration package/. wtf!? and who gets

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2007-01-06 Thread Daniel Baumann
maximilian attems wrote: it would be cool if random bug reporter, would have the deceny to _accept_ mail. indeed :/ closing due to unresponsive bug reporter. fine with me. kel, please reopen and set the owner accordingly to a working address if you ask for inclusion. -- Address:

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2006-12-02 Thread Kel Modderman
On Friday 01 December 2006 21:30, Bastian Blank wrote: tags 400752 moreinfo thanks On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:17:20AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please consider including ndiswrapper. Patch attached, based on existing

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2006-12-01 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 400752 moreinfo thanks On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:17:20AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please consider including ndiswrapper. Patch attached, based on existing support for spca5xx. There are reports that ndiswrapper won't

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

2006-11-28 Thread Kel Modderman
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please consider including ndiswrapper. Patch attached, based on existing support for spca5xx. Thanks, Kel. diff -Nrup linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18.orig/defines linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18/defines ---