On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, that's what happened and now when I think about it the behavior is as
documented. But what's the reasoning for not creating ~/.gnupg if it's
still needed?
It is not always needed.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Markus Järvinen wrote:
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: normal
If I understand correctly, gpg --no-options is supposed to ignore
~/.gnupg completely. However I get the following errors when using it:
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: normal
If I understand correctly, gpg --no-options is supposed to ignore
~/.gnupg completely. However I get the following errors when using it:
$ echo foo | gpg -c --no-options /dev/null
gpg: keyblock resource `/home/m/.gnupg/pubring.gpg': file open
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Markus Järvinen wrote:
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: normal
If I understand correctly, gpg --no-options is supposed to ignore
~/.gnupg completely. However I get the following errors when using it:
$ echo foo | gpg -c --no-options
4 matches
Mail list logo
