Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-12-01 Thread Brian Gough
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Hi Petr, On 30 November 2006 at 14:29, Petr Salinger wrote: | Package: gsl | Severity: important | Version: 1.8-2 | Tags: patch | | Hi, | | the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port was

Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-12-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 1 December 2006 at 11:23, Brian Gough wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Hi Petr, | | On 30 November 2006 at 14:29, Petr Salinger wrote: | | Package: gsl | | Severity: important | | Version: 1.8-2 | | Tags: patch | | | | Hi, | | | | the current version fails to build on

Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Petr Salinger
Package: gsl Severity: important Version: 1.8-2 Tags: patch Hi, the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. It needs small tweak to configure.ac/configure, see bellow. It would also be nice if you can ask upstream to include this change. Thanks in advance

Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Petr, On 30 November 2006 at 14:29, Petr Salinger wrote: | Package: gsl | Severity: important | Version: 1.8-2 | Tags: patch | | Hi, | | the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port was an officially supported

Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi Dirk. the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port was an officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is inflated, no? For official releasable architecture it would be 'serious'. The correct

Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 30 November 2006 at 17:55, Petr Salinger wrote: | Hi Dirk. | | the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. | | Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port | was an officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is | inflated, no? | | For