[not cc'ed to debian-release and exiv2]
On Thursday, 21. December 2006 16:46, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
[...]
> From what I can see, this is fine. bugs.d.o doesn't report anything
> unusual, but I would love to know if #393505 and #396249 are fixed in
> 2:0.8.2-2.
FWIW: a quick try of an aliot
"Mark Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given the discussion has died down.
>
> I am proposing to release digikam[imageplugins] 0.8.2 to unstable in the
> next couple of days to overcome the lack of an libexiv2 transition.
From what I can see, this is fine. bugs.d.o doesn't report anything
un
Given the discussion has died down.
I am proposing to release digikam[imageplugins] 0.8.2 to unstable in the
next couple of days to overcome the lack of an libexiv2 transition.
The current release is in svn.debian.org, for those who would like to have
a look before it goes formal.
Mark
--
To
3 matches
Mail list logo
