On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that
hunspell dictionaries
then
Rene Engelhard wrote:
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage
of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible.
probably not so full backwards compatibility.
[ The Problem is
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that
Hi,
Davide Prina wrote:
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage
of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible.
probably not so full backwards compatibility.
Proof?
also
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict
against all mozillas...
I fail to see why. Are the hunspell dictionaries in
/usr/share/myspell/dicts or what ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Davide Prina wrote:
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage
of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible.
probably not so full backwards compatibility.
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:32:50PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
How does the security team feel about having to rebuild iceape,
iceweasel, icedove (you forgot to file a bug on icedove), OOo and enchant
if there happens to be a security bug in hunspell ?
In general having multiple packages
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict
against
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict
against all mozillas...
I
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:49:12AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because of this. Binaries which link to a SONAME which only exist in
distributions inventing a SONAME don't work elsewhere. Binaries built
on Fedora (and Debian if i'd apply it if
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:12:47PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:49:12AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of this. Binaries which link to a SONAME which only exist in
distributions inventing a
Mike Hommey wrote:
And in any case, adding a new shared lib now is too late for etch anyway
whereas linking with hunspell can be done for etch still.
Adding a new shared lib is too late but doing untested and unsupported
things is not. mwarf.
A shared lib is a new package and enchant, OOo
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:52:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting you ignored all mine comments in my last mail because of
Mozilla doesn't support it even when you a) patch system-myspell in
yourself b) symlink myspell/ to the shared dictionaries. Both is good,
and
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that
hunspell dictionaries
then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security
team knows
that
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:52:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting you ignored all mine comments in my last mail because of
Mozilla doesn't support it even when you a) patch system-myspell in
yourself b) symlink myspell/ to the shared
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell
dictionaries
then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team
knows
that mozilla needs to be rebuilt
[ also Cc'ing iceweasels bug ]
Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 08:12 schrieben Sie:
block 401969 by 324637
thanks
[...]
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage
of
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[ also Cc'ing iceweasels bug ]
Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 08:12 schrieben Sie:
block 401969 by 324637
thanks
[...]
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[ also Cc'ing iceweasels bug ]
Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 08:12 schrieben Sie:
block 401969 by 324637
thanks
[...]
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:49:12AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because of this. Binaries which link to a SONAME which only exist in
distributions inventing a SONAME don't work elsewhere. Binaries built
on Fedora (and Debian if i'd apply it if shared libs' future in hunspell
block 401969 by 324637
thanks
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:07:22AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: iceape
Version: 1.0.6-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
retaining
21 matches
Mail list logo
