Hi Mark,
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 10:24:48AM +, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 10:10, Mark Purcell wrote:
The alternative, which is better, is just to back out the library
transition.
Or even better-better, just don't do the library transition at all.
The current
On Thursday 07 December 2006 21:48, Mark Purcell wrote:
debian-release,
I'm proposing a library transition for libcommoncpp2, the last upload
contained a hidden backward-incompatible ABI change which has only come to
light.
The alternative, which is better, is just to back out the library
On Saturday 09 December 2006 10:10, Mark Purcell wrote:
The alternative, which is better, is just to back out the library
transition.
Or even better-better, just don't do the library transition at all.
The current state of libcommoncpp2 (1.5.1) and rdepends in etch is stable and
supportable.
debian-release,
I'm proposing a library transition for libcommoncpp2, the last upload
contained a hidden backward-incompatible ABI change which has only come to
light.
I have patched upstream to bump the soname to 1.5.3 and this will generate a
debian package of libcommoncpp2-1.5.3-0, which
4 matches
Mail list logo
