Keith, here's the patch written during your talk at LCA ;)
It fixes bug 402014, by simply adding '-f' to the fc-cache run, hence
me filing it under this bug number. Really though, this patch avoids
creating symlinks for fonts that are already in a directory covered by
fontconfig - but I couldn't
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 17:39 +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> Keith, here's the patch written during your talk at LCA ;)
>
> It fixes bug 402014, by simply adding '-f' to the fc-cache run, hence
> me filing it under this bug number. Really though, this patch avoids
> creating symlinks for fonts that are
At Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:19:01 +1100, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 17:39 +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> > Keith, here's the patch written during your talk at LCA ;)
> >
> > It fixes bug 402014, by simply adding '-f' to the fc-cache run, hence
> > me filing it under this bug number. Reall
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 23:08 +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> hrm. you're right - we need to run fc-cache on the directories we
> didn't need to symlink to ..
Would it be better to add the new font directories to the fontconfig
configuration instead of symlinking the files to /var?
Oh, and we need to u
On 1/22/07, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 23:08 +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> hrm. you're right - we need to run fc-cache on the directories we
> didn't need to symlink to ..
Would it be better to add the new font directories to the fontconfig
configuration instea
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 00:07 +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
>
> I can do so, but the symlinking seems simpler. defoma tracks fonts by
> filename, so its possible for fonts to be scattered anywhere in the
> filesystem.How does the fontconfig searching/caching mechanism
> scale? For example, a naive
6 matches
Mail list logo
