On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:05:51AM -0500, Kevin Johnson wrote:
I guess I am confused at some of what is being suggested. I had
recommend just removing the dependency on Image_graph and was told it was a
half-assed idea? And if you remove the dependance, why would you remove
the link?
severity 402406 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:26:32PM +0100, Daniel Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
Therefore, I think the problem here is time. It would be a pity to lose
this package for this silly thing.
License issues are not a silly thing. They are rather important if we want
to
On Dec 12, 2006, at 4:54 AM, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
severity 402406 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:26:32PM +0100, Daniel Rodriguez Garcia
wrote:
Therefore, I think the problem here is time. It would be a pity to
lose
this package for this silly thing.
License
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:05:51AM -0500, Kevin Johnson wrote:
I guess I am confused at some of what is being suggested. I had recommend
just removing the dependency on Image_graph and was told it was a
half-assed idea? And if you remove the dependance, why would you remove
the link?
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:54:11AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Currently I think that's the only viable option, remove the php-image-graph
*and* ensure the package can work without it. I agree with Jeremy that
providing a package that does not Depend: on php-image-graph but
El mar, 12-12-2006 a las 21:40 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
escribió:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:54:11AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
Currently I think that's the only viable option, remove the php-image-graph
*and* ensure the package can work without it. I agree
6 matches
Mail list logo
