On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:43:58 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided to go with no prefix, since mozilla- prefix is a trademark
and point of having it nowadays is quite absent.
So now the package is simply foxyproxy. I will tag it
accordingly:
implemented-in::TODO
I've decided to go with no prefix, since mozilla- prefix is a trademark
and point of having it nowadays is quite absent.
So now the package is simply foxyproxy. I will tag it
accordingly:
implemented-in::TODO (JavaScript is a missing tag although present in
devel::lang)
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-foxyproxy
I don't think we should still use the mozilla-* prefix for extension
packages ... now that we have ice*.
also sprach Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.12.12.1119 +0100]:
I don't think we should still use the mozilla-* prefix for extension
packages ... now that we have ice*.
Also, foxyproxy has an amazing track record of instability. I ended
up purging it again. Just FYI.
--
.''`. martin
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-foxyproxy
I don't think
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:55:59PM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko
Indeed, I stopped for a moment while deciding upon the name, but then
proceeded since all the other extensions have this prefix. Problem is
that iceweasel is not a common name for all mozilla products (former
mozilla-browser, mozilla-thunderbird, etc) which all could use some
common plugins ,
Thanks for the info. I used to use switchproxy but after some upgrade I
was looking for something different and came across foxyproxy. It has
been working fine for me. Anyways, foxyproxy is not to be in etch
release, so I will take a burden of trying to resolve/forward issues
users would encounter
I don't think we should still use the mozilla-* prefix for extension
packages ... now that we have ice*.
But then, what to use instead ?
Reading from the package description, this extension is just for
iceweasel ... so maybe iceweasel-foxyproxy ...
With a little work, such an
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:54:34PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
So possible ways I see
1. leave it as is and have mozilla- prefix
2. figure out substitution to the mozilla trademark
3. remove prefix once and forever and use appropriate tags. After all,
many applications use some common
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:13:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:55:59PM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:37:18AM +0100, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, for me the most consistent practice for packaging ice* extensions
post etch would be to use the extension name as package name and put
info about its relation to our ice-apps into (short) description and
Package: wnpp
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-foxyproxy
Version : 2.2.1-fx+fl
Upstream Author : LeahScape, Inc. and Eric H. Jung
* URL or Web page : http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/
* License : GPL v.2
Description :
14 matches
Mail list logo
