Bug#402737: patch: append to .rej files instead of overwriting them (fwd)

2009-03-15 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
Hello, On Friday, 15 December 2006 19:43:41 Christoph Berg wrote: Hi, here's another bug from a Debian user: if you have several patches in a single file that touch the same file, rejects from the different patches will overwrite each other. I think patch should concatenate them. Thanks

Bug#402737: patch: append to .rej files instead of overwriting them

2008-09-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that if a single patchfile has many patches for the same file you only get the last rejection. That is not right. The other problem is that it makes the --reject-file=FILE option mostly useless. If a patch has rejects in multiple files, FILE is incomplete. --

Bug#402737: patch: append to .rej files instead of overwriting them

2006-12-15 Thread Christoph Berg
tags 402737 - moreinfo severity 402737 normal thanks Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even feeding all the patches with: cat ~/patches/program_* | patch -p1 -s will not work correctly and you just get the last rejection. Ah, of course that's something to be considered. I'll

Bug#402737: patch: append to .rej files instead of overwriting them

2006-12-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: patch Version: 2.5.9-4 Patch replaces .rej files instead of appending to them. Use case: If you apply a set of patches in sequence and you get .rej files you should get .rej files appended and not replaced to not lose .rej data Prueba el correo Terra ( http://www.terra.es/correo );

Bug#402737: patch: append to .rej files instead of overwriting them

2006-12-12 Thread Christoph Berg
severity 402737 wishlist tags 402737 + moreinfo thanks Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch replaces .rej files instead of appending to them. Use case: If you apply a set of patches in sequence and you get .rej files you should get .rej files appended and not replaced to

Bug#402737: patch: append to .rej files instead of overwriting them

2006-12-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph Berg wrote: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch replaces .rej files instead of appending to them. Use case: If you apply a set of patches in sequence and you get .rej files you should get .rej files appended and not replaced to not lose .rej data However,