Hi Thijs,
thanks for you to participate in the discussion. I have seen that you
and Moritz has been the persons who had been active in mantis bug fixing.
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
It makes me somehow angry that i invested so much work in bringing
mantis back in a good shape, when people can block
2006/12/14, schönfeld / in-medias-res.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Until the
next release of Debian I will try to keep mantis packages as up-to-date
as possible and then we will hopefully re-integrate it.
Patrick,
This will still help Debian users, especially if you provide a
backport for Etch.
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
2006/12/14, schönfeld / in-medias-res.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Until the
next release of Debian I will try to keep mantis packages as up-to-date
as possible and then we will hopefully re-integrate it.
Patrick,
This will still help Debian users, especially if you
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 09:49 +0100, schönfeld / in-medias-res.com
wrote:
I quiet understand the etch release policy and I am sure that there are
cases where 5a matches the case. But in the case of mantis it does *not*
match. Because there is currently *one* open security issue which where
just
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 09:49 +0100, schönfeld / in-medias-res.com
wrote:
I quiet understand the etch release policy and I am sure that there are
cases where 5a matches the case. But in the case of mantis it does *not*
match. Because there is currently *one* open
Package: mantis
Severity: serious
As per http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt - 5a, I am opening
this RC bug against mantis to prevent it from releasing until which
time the security team is convinced that it is a package that can
be reasonably supported.
See the discussion thread here:
6 matches
Mail list logo
