On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 00:02 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
In the tpm2deb.cfg it is written:
# collection psutils and ttfutils die, should be proper debian packages
but at least ttfutils seem to be not to go this way. We should include
this in our packages, or create a new binary package
Hi Ralf!
On Don, 14 Dez 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
In the tpm2deb.cfg it is written:
# collection psutils and ttfutils die, should be proper debian packages
but at least ttfutils seem to be not to go this way. We should include
this in our packages, or create a new binary package
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ttfdump (no idea where that comes from, no idea what it is)
It seems to be available only in TeXlive now, not even separately on
CTAN. And the project it was once supposed to be part of of doesn't
seem to exist, and the developer is MIA: All changes since
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ttfdump (no idea where that comes from, no idea what it is)
It seems to be available only in TeXlive now, not even separately on
CTAN. And the project it was once supposed to be part of of doesn't
seem to exist, and the developer
Norbert Preining wrote:
Please note that ttfdump is NOT build in TeX Live 2005, and it is only
present in the windows part of the tpm file. So I am not convinced that
it builds at all, works at all,...
This is true also for texlive-svn, also there is no ttfdump on linux
binary.
Ok. Thanks
On Don, 14 Dez 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
It seems to be available only in TeXlive now, not even separately on
CTAN. And the project it was once supposed to be part of of doesn't
seem to exist, and the developer is MIA: All changes since 1998 have
been done by Werner Lemberg.
And the
Package: texlive-bin
Severity: normal
Hi myself and all the others!
In the tpm2deb.cfg it is written:
# collection psutils and ttfutils die, should be proper debian packages
but at least ttfutils seem to be not to go this way. We should include
this in our packages, or create a new binary
7 matches
Mail list logo
