Bug#403117:

2007-04-14 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
owner 403117 ! clone 403117 -1 close 403117 severity -1 important retitle -1 Package license is ambiguous; may be incompatible with GPL thanks I'm closing #403117 as the copyright information is now listed correctly. However, the issue as to the meaning of the license is outstanding, so I am cloni

Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL

2007-02-12 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 403117 etch-ignore thanks As 2.5-2 fixes the problems with the incomplete debian/copyright and should enter testing shortly, I'm tagging this bug etch-ignore for the remaining question of whether the required disclaimer is intended to contradict the GPL. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL

2007-02-10 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! This was apparently fixed in the 2.5-2 upload: * add xmms-mp4 desription read not like nonsense (Closes: #399457) * Compile without Digital Radio Mondiale support, as it breaks base functionality * Update debian/copyright (See: #403117) Matthew, so you agree that this bug can b

Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL

2006-12-28 Thread Sebastian Dröge
You might want to read this regarding the license issue: http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2006/12/20/lets-hear-the-communitys-voice-the-faad-2-5-licensing-issue I also tried to contact ahead a few times in the past with absolutely no answer. As you might've noticed I'm maintaining

Bug#403117:

2006-12-23 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
I've emailed upstream to clarify the licensing issue, and added updated the debian/copyright file. I will upload is on a timed wait on upstream. Matthew W. S. Bell signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL

2006-12-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under > plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state > (other files too): > [... GPL boilerplate ...] > ** Software using this code must display

Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL

2006-12-14 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Package: faad2 Version: 2.5-1 Severity: grave Hi, currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state (other files too): [... GPL boilerplate ...] ** Software using this code must display the following message v