On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:10:20PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > As reports of broken sid systems rose up, Andreas Barth NMUed
> > your package yesterday in a 0-day NMU policy. He setup an epoch
> > to the package version which IMHO is a bad thing now that we
> > have the possibility of ~ in versi
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:22 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:57:00PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hmm, my upload got rejected for some version ... I've sent off some
> > mail to try figure out why.
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 03:02 +, Debian Installer wrote:
> > >
Hi Andi,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:55 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Nathan, it is really not the right moment to exchange core libraries.
Understood. I certainly didn't want to be uploading anything at this
time. :|
> There is already a fixed version uploaded, and I would propose that you
> just
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:57:00PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hmm, my upload got rejected for some version ... I've sent off some
> mail to try figure out why.
>
> On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 03:02 +, Debian Installer wrote:
> > Rejected: libattr1-dev_2.4.36-1_i386.deb: old version (1:2.4.32-1.1)
* Nathan Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 08:20]:
> On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:36 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > > There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
> >
> > Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed v
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:36 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
>
> Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
> uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
>
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
cheers.
--
Nathan
clone 403585 -1
reassign -1 libacl1
found -1 2.2.42-1
retitle -1 Regression in 2.2.42-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> Package: libattr1
> Version: 2.4.35-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: make other packages FTBFS
>
> There has been a regression on
Package: libattr1
Version: 2.4.35-1
Severity: serious
Justification: make other packages FTBFS
There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
When building gnu-fdisk yesterday for instance, it went fine. However,
today with 2.4.35-1, I got:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ag/buil
9 matches
Mail list logo
