Steve asked today:
fjp: I'm confused why bug #403687 is marked as RC, instead of bug
#402511
I've decided to answer by mail instead of on IRC because this issue
probably needs some coordination between maintainers of several packages.
It looks certain that #402511, and probably also #401393 we
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:18, Frans Pop wrote:
> [1] The crypto devices in /dev/mapper/ *are* correctly removed after
> S48cryptdisks has run, but the corresponding /dev/dm-* devices are not.
Note that cryptsetup is rather cleaner in this respect than the lvm tools
as after /etc/rc0.d/S50lv
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 16:18]:
> IMO the issues listed above together are serious enough that they should
> be fixed, or at least addressed, before the release of Etch.
> I'm filing the BR against lvm2 as that is the package most responsible for
> the lvm setup in Debian, though
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.06-3
Severity: serious
There are currently at least two reports floating around that seem to have
the same root cause: the way devmapper devices are created for lvm
partitions. The relevant reports are:
http://bugs.debian.org/401393 (currently against lilo)
http://bug
4 matches
Mail list logo
