Bug#404927: udev/aacraid interaction - should aacraid set 'removable'?

2007-01-05 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
I do not have any close at hand (cleaned out the hardware closet to hazardous waste) :-( But, as far as I am concerned :-), if it says 'DPT' or 'Adaptec' as the manufacturer's name portion of the inquiry field, or has 'RAID' or 'Array' somewhere in the product name inquiry field, you have covered

Bug#404927: udev/aacraid interaction - should aacraid set 'removable'?

2007-01-05 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:17:47PM -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > The ips driver, indirectly via Firmware as it spoofs it's own inquiry > data, reports the Removable bit set in the inquiry response for the > arrays. The dpt_i2o driver similarly has the firmware constructing the > bit set. Some of th

Bug#404927: udev/aacraid interaction - should aacraid set 'removable'?

2007-01-03 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
The ips driver, indirectly via Firmware as it spoofs it's own inquiry data, reports the Removable bit set in the inquiry response for the arrays. The dpt_i2o driver similarly has the firmware constructing the bit set. Some of the Array Bridges and external RAID boxes do the same thing. I think the

Bug#404927: udev/aacraid interaction - should aacraid set 'removable'?

2007-01-03 Thread dann frazier
(lkml readers: this concerns a security issue reported to debian by a user of udev/aacraid. udev gives the aacraid devices the floppy group because it reports block devices as 'removable'. See http://bugs.debian.org/404927 for the entire thread). On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:49:51AM +0100, Marco d'I