Bug#405639: Bug#406058: failed to load module kbd

2007-01-08 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:27:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2007 at 13:21:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > So what should be done with this bug? Should it be merged with bug #405639? > > Do you think it needs to be treated as RC independently of bug #405639? > > (FWIW,

Bug#405639: Bug#406058: failed to load module kbd

2007-01-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 8, 2007 at 13:21:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > So what should be done with this bug? Should it be merged with bug #405639? > Do you think it needs to be treated as RC independently of bug #405639? > (FWIW, I don't; smooth upgrades from unofficial backports are absolutely not > RC