On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> apparently the build dependency has been dropped again; was there a
> reason to rush the glibc upload and not to wait for the binutils
> update?
For when is the binutils update scheduled?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
reopen 405738
found 405738 2.5-1
apparently the build dependency has been dropped again; was there a
reason to rush the glibc upload and not to wait for the binutils
update?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 405738 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:01:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: glibc
> Version: 2.5
> Tags: experimental
> Severity: important
>
> glibc uses --hash-style for linking, when detected. Please
> build-depend on the appropriate binutils version, so that glibc i
Package: glibc
Version: 2.5
Tags: experimental
Severity: important
glibc uses --hash-style for linking, when detected. Please
build-depend on the appropriate binutils version, so that glibc is
always built using --hash-style=both.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
4 matches
Mail list logo