Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-04-11 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > apparently the build dependency has been dropped again; was there a > reason to rush the glibc upload and not to wait for the binutils > update? For when is the binutils update scheduled? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-04-11 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 405738 found 405738 2.5-1 apparently the build dependency has been dropped again; was there a reason to rush the glibc upload and not to wait for the binutils update? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-01-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
tag 405738 + pending thanks On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:01:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: glibc > Version: 2.5 > Tags: experimental > Severity: important > > glibc uses --hash-style for linking, when detected. Please > build-depend on the appropriate binutils version, so that glibc i

Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-01-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: glibc Version: 2.5 Tags: experimental Severity: important glibc uses --hash-style for linking, when detected. Please build-depend on the appropriate binutils version, so that glibc is always built using --hash-style=both. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of