Bug#406030: xserver-xorg-video-i810: No direct rendering with i810?

2007-01-09 Thread i810 . deb . iridos
Hi, So, the correct solution here is probably to just uninstall fglrx (you probably don't need anyway if you have a i810 board?). You are 100% right there. 1. It actually was fglrx-driver breaking it, 2. a fglrx-driver is not needed with an i810 chip and 3. I don't know why the fglrx-driver

Bug#406030: xserver-xorg-video-i810: No direct rendering with i810?

2007-01-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 05:27 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: line from xorg log -- (II) I810(0): direct rendering: Enabled xorg log end-- Yet, glxinfo reports differently: glxinfo call/output --- # glxinfo |head name of display: :0.0

Bug#406030: xserver-xorg-video-i810: No direct rendering with i810?

2007-01-08 Thread i810 . deb . iridos
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Michel Dänzer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo 21 /dev/null should give a hint. Ok, it does (thanks for the hint): -- $ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo 21 /dev/null libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 1.7.2 i915 (screen 0) libGL:

Bug#406030: xserver-xorg-video-i810: No direct rendering with i810?

2007-01-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 14:58 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Michel Dänzer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo 21 /dev/null should give a hint. Ok, it does (thanks for the hint): -- $ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo 21 /dev/null

Bug#406030: xserver-xorg-video-i810: No direct rendering with i810?

2007-01-08 Thread i810 . deb . iridos
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Michel Dänzer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So there's a version mismatch between libgl1-mesa-dri (i915_dri) and libgl1-mesa-glx/fglrx-driver (libGL) [both packages contain i915_dri.so, both are installed] Yes, fglrx's libGL is not compatible with current libgl1-mesa-dri.

Bug#406030: xserver-xorg-video-i810: No direct rendering with i810?

2007-01-08 Thread Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Michel Dänzer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, fglrx's libGL is not compatible with current libgl1-mesa-dri. Ok, but the debian package resolve that (probably by having libGL from libgl1-mesa-dri in both packages. The libGL in fglrx is a special