On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> 1.18.1 is out: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.18.1.2
I've uploaded 1.18.1.2 packages, however I have no idea if it will
build on i386 or amd64, as I've got a patch in there which changes the
way compiler flags
On Saturday 18 August 2007 08:18, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> I've uploaded 1.18.1.2 packages, however I have no idea if it will
> build on i386 or amd64, as I've got a patch in there which changes the
> way compiler flags are put together compared to upstream (which also
> changed since 1.18.0.6,
Am Montag, 20. August 2007 13:25 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> On Saturday 18 August 2007 08:18, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > I've uploaded 1.18.1.2 packages, however I have no idea if it will
> > build on i386 or amd64, as I've got a patch in there which changes the
> > way compiler flags are put toge
On Monday 20 August 2007 13:41, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 20. August 2007 13:25 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> > On Saturday 18 August 2007 08:18, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > > I've uploaded 1.18.1.2 packages, however I have no idea if it will
> > > build on i386 or amd64, as I've got a patch i
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:05:48PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Monday 20 August 2007 13:41, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>> Am Montag, 20. August 2007 13:25 schrieb Marcos Marado:
> >> On Saturday 18 August 2007 08:18, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > >> I've uploaded 1.18.1.2 packages, however I have no
Good morning,
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 00:07, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > Looking to SConstruct:
[...]
> > So, STANDALONE is False, but VECTORIZE (at True) needs STANDALONE...
> > What's wrong here?
>
> Nothing. The debian/rules file passes in STANDALONE=True.
Oh, I see.
> This however is br
FYI:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.18.2.0
slviewer 1.18.2.0 is out.
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:02:30AM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> Understand. Well, I wasn't able to build the package with your
> 30_vectorisation_for_all.dpatch , so I removed that patch for my packages. I
> had no time to see what's wrong with the patch, but I suspect that with the
> patch and
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 00:18, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:02:30AM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> > Understand. Well, I wasn't able to build the package with your
> > 30_vectorisation_for_all.dpatch , so I removed that patch for my
> > packages. I had no time to see wh
Just a heads up:
1.18.1 is out: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.18.1.2
This is an optional update, so you might not want to go through the process of
updating the packages, even if I would like for you to do that ;-)
Best regards,
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> Just a heads up:
> 1.18.1 is out: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.18.1.2
> This is an optional update, so you might not want to go through the process
> of
> updating the packages, even if I would like for yo
Just a heads up,
A new version is out there:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.17.2.0
--
Marcos Marado
Sonaecom IT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:53:34PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> Just a heads up,
> A new version is out there:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.17.2.0
Yeah, sorry about that.
Given the 1.17 updates are optional, I'll just build 1.18 when it
releases (tomorrow, if I under
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:35, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:53:34PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> > Just a heads up,
> >
> > A new version is out there:
> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Source_downloads#ver_1.17.2.0
>
> Yeah, sorry about that.
No problem, I was just try
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:35, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Given the 1.17 updates are optional, I'll just build 1.18 when it
> releases (tomorrow, if I understand correctly) unless anyone's
> aware of a specific fix in 1.17 series that's outstanding?
Just a heads up:
1.18 is out: http://wiki.second
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:37:40AM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Monday 09 July 2007 15:35, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> Given the 1.17 updates are optional, I'll just build 1.18 when it
>> releases (tomorrow, if I understand correctly) unless anyone's
>> aware of a specific fix in 1.17 series t
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 August 2007 00:18, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:02:30AM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> >> Understand. Well, I wasn't able to build the package with your
> >> 30_vectorisation_for_all.dpatch ,
On Monday 27 August 2007 13:43, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Ah, right, that's a thinko on my part. Autovectorisation needs -msse or
> -msse2 passed in.
>
> On AMD64, that's easy, they all have SSE2 I'm told.
>
> For the i386 build, apparently the Athlon Thunderbirds are supported,
> and they only d
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:37:40AM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> On Monday 09 July 2007 15:35, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> Given the 1.17 updates are optional, I'll just build 1.18 when it
>> releases (tomorrow, if I understand correctly) unless anyone's
>> aware of a specific fix in 1.17 series t
Paul,
thanks for the update. I compiled the package for etch again.
I did one minor (?) change:
To avoid:
g++ -o
lib_release_client/i686-linux/libllmessage.so --no-keep-memory
--reduce-memory-overheads -shared
/tmp/rd/home/rd/SW.nobackup/SL-1.18/slviewer-1.18.0.6/indra/i686-linux-client-rel
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:30:51PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Paul,
> thanks for the update. I compiled the package for etch again.
> I did one minor (?) change:
> To avoid:
> g++ -o
[trim] ^_^
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_regex-mt
> I changed debian/patches/49_shared_libraries_are_
Am Montag, 23. Juli 2007 02:20 schrieben Sie:
> I guess this will just have to live as an etch-specific change, I
> don't see any good way of dealing with this automatically.
I was hoping that you have a good idea here. But nevermind, this is an easy to
remember change.
Thanks,
Rainer
--
Raine
22 matches
Mail list logo
