Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

2007-01-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:10:30PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Could this be backported to the debian package, so that unixodbc (and probably others) can stop FTBFS? This only helps if they build-depend on libtool, which unixodbc doesn't do. It will atleast require an update of unixodbc

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

2007-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:46:51PM CET: I was waiting for a new upstream version of libtool, but I guess I'll backport some of the fixes. I'm in the process of what will hopefully be the last few patches on the way to 1.5.24. I've got 3 more in the queue, pending more

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

2007-01-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
tags 407079 + fixed-upstream thanks Hi, Ralf Wildenhues, le Mon 29 Jan 2007 20:51:45 +0100, a écrit : [ Libtoolers, this is http://bugs.debian.org/407079 ] * Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:43:36AM CET: Michael Banck, le Mon 22 Jan 2007 22:38:49 +0100, a écrit :

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl,--version-script

2007-01-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:10:43AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0100, a écrit : What would gnu* be good for? For hurd-i386. What's the complete host string (or possible strings) for Hurd? I'm asking because I fear gnu* may be too permissive.

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl,--version-script

2007-01-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ralf Wildenhues, le Sun 21 Jan 2007 15:59:27 +0100, a écrit : * Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:10:43AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0100, a écrit : What would gnu* be good for? For hurd-i386. What's the complete host string (or possible

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

2007-01-21 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
At Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:59:27 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:10:43AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0100, a écrit : What would gnu* be good for? For hurd-i386. What's the complete host string

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl,--version-script

2007-01-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Samuel, * Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:31:21AM CET: unixodbc currently FTBFS at least on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-i386 when performing its manifest check because libtool doesn't make it use the --version-script option. Indeed, it is only set on $host_os ~= linux*):

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl,--version-script

2007-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ralf Wildenhues, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0100, a écrit : linux*) should be changed into gnu* | linux* | kfreebsd*-gnu | knetbsd*-gnu) What would gnu* be good for? For hurd-i386. Samuel

Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl,--version-script

2007-01-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: libtool Version: 1.5.22-4 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hi, unixodbc currently FTBFS at least on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-i386 when performing its manifest check because libtool doesn't make it use the --version-script option. Indeed, it is only set on $host_os ~= linux*): linux*)