On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 23:20 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 22:34 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
[..wrong patch..]
No, thats
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:14:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
works fine with original debian ld10k1 packages and patched
alsa-drivers, thanks.
Gents, should we try to push it in etch?
I think so. Do you know how to create a branch (svn cp of the revision
before experiemntal changes,
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 23:20 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 22:34 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
[..wrong patch..]
No, thats me ;)
ok, i will try with new kernel build soon.
works fine with
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 23:20 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 22:34 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
[..wrong patch..]
No, thats
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:39:03AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
doesn't sound 'grave' to me; if anything, it sounds like a bug in
2.6.19 for changing interfaces in ways that break userspace.
yes, exactly this. Should this be reported anywhere?
Preferably, upstream to
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Mikael Magnusson told:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:39:03AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
doesn't sound 'grave' to me; if anything, it sounds like a bug in
2.6.19 for changing interfaces in ways that break userspace.
yes, exactly
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 22:34 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
[..wrong patch..]
No, thats me ;)
ok, i will try with new kernel build soon.
Caught from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/43895:
diff -r beb52b12c43f include/emu10k1.h
--- a/include/emu10k1.h Tue Jan 16
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 17:36 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Mikael Magnusson told:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:39:03AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 17:36 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Mikael Magnusson told:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:39:03AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
doesn't sound 'grave' to me; if anything, it sounds like a bug
in 2.6.19
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 22:34 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
[..wrong patch..]
No, thats me ;)
ok, i will try with new kernel build soon.
Caught from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/43895:
diff -r
severity 407690 important
retitle 407690 ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel
thanks
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
problem was a kernel structure has changed in 2.6.19.2.
kernel structure snd_emu10k1_fx8010_control_gpr in
include/sound/emu10k1.h was changed to
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 07:27 schrieb Steve Langasek:
severity 407690 important
retitle 407690 ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel
thanks
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
problem was a kernel structure has changed in 2.6.19.2.
kernel structure
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:39:03AM +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
doesn't sound 'grave' to me; if anything, it sounds like a bug in
2.6.19 for changing interfaces in ways that break userspace.
yes, exactly this. Should this be reported anywhere?
Preferably, upstream to the kernel maintainers
problem was a kernel structure has changed in 2.6.19.2.
kernel structure snd_emu10k1_fx8010_control_gpr in
include/sound/emu10k1.h was changed to the version provided 2.6.19.2.
This results in memory corruption in ld10k1 if you compile it with
debian libasound2-dev headers.
--
To
14 matches
Mail list logo
