Bug#407695: python-fuse: I have made a quick patch

2007-01-20 Thread gary ng
Package: python-fuse Version: 2.5-5 Followup-For: Bug #407695 Below is a diff of the quick patch I made. It does not interfere with existing applications if they work within the existing 2*31 -1 size limit. If they do, the change would mean read/write/truncate would receive the correct offset size

Bug#407695: python-fuse: I have made a quick patch

2007-01-21 Thread Sebastien Delafond
tag 407695 + patch thanks Passing on this "quick" patch to upstream... --Seb On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:36:50PM +0800, gary ng wrote: > Package: python-fuse > Version: 2.5-5 > Followup-For: Bug #407695 > > Below is a diff of the quick patch I made. It does not interfere with > existing applicat

Bug#407695: python-fuse: I have made a quick patch

2007-01-23 Thread Csaba Henk
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:56:33PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote: > tag 407695 + patch > Passing on this "quick" patch to upstream... This patch is against a quite old version of fuse-python. > > I see is the C wrapper of getattr still expect a 32 bit signed integer so it > > cannot be returned

Bug#407695: python-fuse: I have made a quick patch

2007-01-23 Thread gary ng
Is this in debian unstable ? I am running etch and need a package that is in debian which is what my patch is against. --- Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:56:33PM -0800, Sebastien > Delafond wrote: > > tag 407695 + patch > > Passing on this "quick" patch to upst

Bug#407695: python-fuse: I have made a quick patch

2007-01-23 Thread Sebastien Delafond
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 05:13:51PM -0800, gary ng wrote: > Is this in debian unstable ? It is not: please use packages.debian.org to verify things like this. > I am running etch and need a package that is in debian which is what > my patch is against. I am more than reluctant to package the curr