Bug#407722: status of libgit.a

2010-03-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Git folks, Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 09:24 + schrieb Gerrit Pape: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:10:02AM -0800, Marc Oscar Singer wrote: Gerrit Pape wrote: […] It depends on upstream. Back then, Junio asked to not provide such a library package in Debian, and I respect that.

Bug#407722: status of libgit.a

2010-03-07 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:27:35AM +0100, Paul Menzel pm.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: You really need to talk to upstream if you want this libgit.a. could you please give an update on the status of libgit.a. For example cgit still could not be packaged yet for Debian [1] because of this bug

Bug#407722: status of libgit.a

2010-03-07 Thread Dmitry Potapov
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:27:35AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: could you please give an update on the status of libgit.a. For example cgit still could not be packaged yet for Debian [1] because of this bug [2]. cgit is used by a lot of projects out there, so I am wondering if the current

Bug#407722: status of libgit.a

2010-03-07 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
On 3/7/10, Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org wrote: I think the only sane solution is what Fedora does as well: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/cgit/ When cgit-1.2.3 is released, have a look at its Makefile, check what Git version does it want and add the relevant Git source

Bug#407722: status of libgit.a

2010-03-07 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Paul Menzel wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 09:24 + schrieb Gerrit Pape: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:10:02AM -0800, Marc Oscar Singer wrote: Gerrit Pape wrote: […] It depends on upstream. Back then, Junio asked to not provide such a library