tags 409524 -etch-ignore
tags 409524 sid
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 03:55:47PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> block 409524 by 405186
> tags 409524 + etch-ignore
Please don't use the etch-ignore tag without discussion with the release
team. The right tag here is really the "sid" tag, to
block 409524 by 405186
tags 409524 + etch-ignore
thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 22:04 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08 19:17]:
>
> > It's currently in the debian-xml-sgml group's CVS, so I thought, the
> > group is already responsible. I'
* Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08 19:17]:
> It's currently in the debian-xml-sgml group's CVS, so I thought, the
> group is already responsible. I'm currently busy with docbook-xsl and
> docbook-defguide, but when the current updates are finished, I would try
> to package the latest
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 17:07 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08 13:53]:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> > > The package builds correctly in my sid chroot on i368.
> >
> > Not in my sid-pbuild
* Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08 13:53]:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> > The package builds correctly in my sid chroot on i368.
>
> Not in my sid-pbuilder (ditto i386). The difference between Etch and Sid
> is the higher versioned libx
* Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-03 21:57]:
> Am Samstag, den 03.02.2007, 20:25 +0100 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> > Package: docbook2x
> > Version: 0.8.3-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid
> >
> > This package fails to build in sid (but not in etch):
> >
> > > Automatic build of
6 matches
Mail list logo
