Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
reassign 409691 atlas3-base severity 409691 serious thanks On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: octave2.9-forge > Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 > Severity: serious > > > > > [main/image] > > panic: Illegal instruction -- stopping myself... > > admin/run_forg

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 22:35]: > * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 22:27]: > > > I guess one possible difference is that this box is an EM64T box > > > rather than AMD64. This shouldn't make a difference in theory but who > > > knows... any idea what

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 22:27]: > > I guess one possible difference is that this box is an EM64T box > > rather than AMD64. This shouldn't make a difference in theory but who > > knows... any idea what I could do to find out more about this problem? > > According to t

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:35:10PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 22:27]: > > > I guess one possible difference is that this box is an EM64T box > > > rather than AMD64. This shouldn't make a difference in theory but who > > > knows... any ide

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
severity 409691 normal thanks * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 22:03]: > May I lower the severity of this bug report to normal? The package > has already been correctly auto-built on amd64 [1]. It seems that > there is a problem in Martin's system (at least, I hope so!). Yes

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:40]: > * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > > It works for me. Are you trying this with a d

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Package: octave2.9-forge > > Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 > > Severity: serious > > > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > Kurt (Q_), ca

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:40:59PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > > It works for me. Are you trying this wi

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > It works for me. Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or > something? No, I verified the problem

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: octave2.9-forge > Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 > Severity: serious > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? It works for me. Are you t

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: octave2.9-forge Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 Severity: serious It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > Automatic build of octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 on em64t by > sbuild/amd64 0.52 ... > Arithmet