On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:14:25PM -0500, Francois Marier wrote:
> I'm tending towards applying this patch but disabling compression by
> default. What do you think?
Sounds reasonable to me, if you don't feel comfortable enabling it by
default.
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:55:06AM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote:
> There are some benchmarks in http://www.gustaebel.de/lars/ccache/
Sorry, I should have looked at that. It looks like the impact of
compression is negligible.
> There's an environment variable, CCACHE_NOCOMPRESS, to turn the
> compres
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 04:50:06PM -0500, Francois Marier wrote:
> Sounds like an interesting idea. The only concern I have is how much
> overhead does that add to the compilation time? Since the whole
> point of using ccache is to speed up compilation, we have to be
> careful about adding extra ov
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:22:42AM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Compressed cache support would be nice, as the caches tend to grow
> quite large. After compressing the cache (with the script)
> my cache dir shrunk from >400 MiB to 94 MiB -> more stuff fits in the
> cache. Seems to work, after some t
Package: ccache
Version: 2.4-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Compressed cache support would be nice, as the caches tend to grow
quite large. There is a patch available at
http://www.gustaebel.de/lars/ccache/
. It applied cleanly to the current debian package and produced a
zlib-enabled ccache; in
5 matches
Mail list logo
