Bug#410111: Updated to 8.34.8; still fails due to GPL symbols

2007-02-27 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:30:48PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > Do you happen to know where this fix is? I grabbed > linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 and found the build fix I applied, but > no other fix. I grabbed linux-source-2.6.20, but did not find any > patches in debian/. Sorry, no. Ask

Bug#410111: Updated to 8.34.8; still fails due to GPL symbols

2007-02-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > FWIW, I believe Ubuntu made some hotfixes for this for Feisty. Do you happen to know where this fix is? I grabbed linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 and found the build fix I applied, but no other fix. I grabbed linux-source-2.6.20, but did not

Bug#410111: Updated to 8.34.8; still fails due to GPL symbols

2007-02-27 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:41:50PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > The ATI fglrx proprietary driver fails to link with 2.6.20 and it seems > this is due to CONFIG_PARAVIRT. People with custom kernels without > CONFIG_PARAVIRT could build this module. Is there a workaround we > could use in the De

Bug#410111: Updated to 8.34.8; still fails due to GPL symbols

2007-02-27 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi Debian Kernel, The ATI fglrx proprietary driver fails to link with 2.6.20 and it seems this is due to CONFIG_PARAVIRT. People with custom kernels without CONFIG_PARAVIRT could build this module. Is there a workaround we could use in the Debian kernel packages to permit building?

Bug#410111: Updated to 8.34.8; still fails due to GPL symbols

2007-02-27 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, I've prepared the new upstream release, 8.34.8, it fails in the same way. Does someone know how to workaround this? I've attached the diff for 8.34.8 with updated patches. @Flavio: could you please merge this (even if it's not for .20)? I can upload to experimental if you like