On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:55:36PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 06:53:59PM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 11:00:26AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:22:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAI
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 06:53:59PM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 11:00:26AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:22:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > was heard to say:
> > > $ time aptitude update asdf
>
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 11:00:26AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:22:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > $ time aptitude update asdf
> > E: The update command takes no arguments
> >
> > While dist-upgrade notices extra arguments, but th
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:22:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> $ time aptitude update asdf
> E: The update command takes no arguments
>
> While dist-upgrade notices extra arguments, but they don't seem to have
> any effect on behavior or exit status. But upgrade
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: minor
$ time aptitude update asdf
E: The update command takes no arguments
While dist-upgrade notices extra arguments, but they don't seem to have
any effect on behavior or exit status. But upgrade asdf doesn't seem to
even notice them.
See also apt
5 matches
Mail list logo