On Feb 05, John Wright wrote:
> Maybe. I'm not sure it would be consistent, though. What if the initrd
> doesn't have persistent-net-rules for two new interfaces? With
> write_net_rules in the initramfs, we should at least have successfully
> renamed all the devices in initramfs, and the "real
Hi Marco,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 01:34:58AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 21, John Wright wrote:
>
> Thank you for your analisys, it is really appreciated.
> But I am not sure that the solution you proposed is optimal:
>
> > * Don't put the persistent-net rules in the initrd.
> >- U
On Jan 21, John Wright wrote:
Thank you for your analisys, it is really appreciated.
But I am not sure that the solution you proposed is optimal:
> * Don't put the persistent-net rules in the initrd.
>- Users can easily modify persistent-net.rules on the system without
> running update
reassign 414287 udev 0.125-7+lenny3
tags 414287 + patch
thanks
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:50:51PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> My box had lenny (installed in December, before the official
> release), I just did:
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> It upgraded the box from 2.6.26-1 to 2.6.26-2
>
> I
My box had lenny (installed in December, before the official release), I
just did:
apt-get dist-upgrade
It upgraded the box from 2.6.26-1 to 2.6.26-2
I did a reboot to get the new kernel
On booting, eth0 became eth0_rename_ren
I looked at:
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
a
5 matches
Mail list logo
