* Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-27 21:06]:
The xfstest suite is pretty good, if anyone would like to run
through it on arm with the above packed structures...
I'll have a look.
Did you get a chance to?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:57:40PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Maybe the alignment isn't broken; it's just special - I guess there
are no actual rules on how the structure must be aligned... hmm...
Yep. Padding rules on old-ABI ARM systems are 'special', but still
spec-compliant. See:
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
Yep. Padding rules on old-ABI ARM systems are 'special', but still
spec-compliant. See:
Thanks, I've read up a bit since, and I think I grok it now :)
So, adding __attribute__((packed)) to xfs_dir2_sf_off_t,
xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t, and perhaps also xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:26:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Yep. Padding rules on old-ABI ARM systems are 'special', but still
spec-compliant. See:
Thanks, I've read up a bit since, and I think I grok it now :)
So, adding __attribute__((packed)) to xfs_dir2_sf_off_t,
Maybe the alignment isn't broken; it's just special - I guess there
are no actual rules on how the structure must be aligned... hmm...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo