On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 02:07:42PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
> there was a base misunderstanding : I did not know that icedove
> was transitioning versus a completely new set of icons.
>
> I have tried the new icedove icons, and, even at small scale,
> they are easily distinguishable from th
hi
there was a base misunderstanding : I did not know that icedove
was transitioning versus a completely new set of icons.
I have tried the new icedove icons, and, even at small scale,
they are easily distinguishable from the iceweasel ones.
So all is fine. Sorry for the noise.
a.
--
To UNSU
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:36:49PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
>
> AFAICT iceweasel deliberately switched to
> havin a blue icon to distinguish it from icedove;
> and it was a Good Thing (tm) : in the above bugs
> 408108 404882 409035, people were complaining
> that, at small sizes, if icedove and i
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:36:49PM +0200, debdev wrote:
> icedove people has simply lost a lot
s/icedove/iceweasel/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:20:46PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> The other issue in your report is that you want me to revert the new
> icon. Which I decided against; thus I closed #416476.
>
> Summary: bug #413976 is the way to go.
lets see if I understand... so icedove icons will
be blue in th
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:09:55PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
>
> you mean 413976 ?
> I looked at it (I filtered for 'icon' in reportbug )
> bug 413976 is saying exactly the opposite of what I am saying,
> it says:
> > the new blue icedove icon looks very good and is a real improvement
> > above
hi
(this is a followup to bug 416476, but
I am CC into bug 413976 as well)
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:49:45PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:41:41PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> >
> > in my installation,
> > - the menu icon of icedove is green
> > and it is /usr/share
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:49:45PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >
> > and this changed in the latest upgrade
> >1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1 -> 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-2
> > in Etch (I saw this happening in two different hosts)
>
> Yes, the icon in the menu is a bug. there is a bug for that already.
and the bug
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:41:41PM +0200, debdev wrote:
> in my installation,
> - the menu icon of icedove is green
> and it is /usr/share/pixmaps/icedove.xpm
> or /usr/share/pixmaps/icedove-menu.xpm
> *but*
> - the icon used in the window listings
> (task manager, window list, ALT-TAB when
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:41:41PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
> you closed the bug
> could you explain me why you claim that the bug is not a bug ?
>
> that is,
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:45:12AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Yeah, convention is what is done ... contrast
hi
you closed the bug
could you explain me why you claim that the bug is not a bug ?
that is,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:45:12AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Yeah, convention is what is done ... contrast vs iceweasel should be
> high enough now.
what do you mean by that ?
in m
11 matches
Mail list logo
