Hi Reinhard,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
That's not much of a problem, I think. I'd rather focus on released
versions than contantly updating to the latest svn trunk version, unless
there is a specific reason to do so. (bugs, etc.).
Well, 0.10 is old and has a few known bugs
Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't have commit rights (at least, not without review) to the main
> Box Backup trunk, but I maintain my own tree and I'm the most active
> developer at the moment, so the best way (IMHO) to get this change
> committed to the trunk is via my working tr
Hi Reinhard,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm currently using boxbackup for my private use. I've crafted packages
for my own used based on the ones from Jérôme Schell, I needed to apply
one patch from upstream though. I'd like to see box
Hi Reinhard,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm currently using boxbackup for my private use. I've crafted packages
for my own used based on the ones from Jérôme Schell, I needed to apply
one patch from upstream though. I'd like to see box
Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm currently using boxbackup for my private use. I've crafted packages
>> for my own used based on the ones from Jérôme Schell, I needed to apply
>> one patch from upstream though. I'd like to see boxbackup in debian, so
>> I'm filing this ITP. Help wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: boxbackup
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Ben Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fluffy.co.uk/boxbackup/
* License : BSD with advertising clause
Programmi
6 matches
Mail list logo
