Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 17:41 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
is released, so I don't have any plans to fix these problems in my
2.1.x sources. You're of
* Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-04 11:34]:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 17:41 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
is released, so I don't have any
* Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-04 11:34]:
Any objections to tagging this bug 'wontfix'?
Nope.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
is released, so I don't have any plans to fix these problems in my
2.1.x sources. You're of course free to fix them in the Debian
packages.
I'd be much more
* John W. Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-02 17:41]:
I'd be much more interested in whether Octave 2.9.10 builds cleanly
with GCC 4.2 and 4.3.
pkg-octave-devel: are you guys planning to upload 2.9.10? If so, I
can test it with 4.2 and 4.3.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To
5 matches
Mail list logo