On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:52:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Please weigh in there if you have any thoughts about the issues we'll > face during the upgrade. The more folks who speak up about what they > need for 3.8.0, the better our package will be.
I'm using dspam as a delivery agent proxy (actually my setup is a bit more complex, my account has a .forward that directs to a delivery script, messages are sent to dspam only if they dont come from localnet and have a non-null sender, null sender messages go thru a RCPT-tag based bounce filter instead) I've been using the hash driver, I like it as it's more lightweight than the database based schemes. I think this (delivery agent with hash driver) would be a reasonable default configuration for small systems. It's quite flexible as different users can choose to go thru dspam - or not - by just changing their .forward. I dont know why it's not advertised more - after all, it's the unix way :) -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse "Bill Gates is a monocle and a Persian cat away from being the villain in a James Bond movie." -- Dennis Miller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
