On 5/29/07, David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:22:38AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The patch looks good to me, though I'd recommend putting a versioned
> >build dependency on libxul-dev.
>
> Ah,
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:22:38AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The patch looks good to me, though I'd recommend putting a versioned
> >build dependency on libxul-dev.
>
> Ah, yes. I should have done that in the first place.
I'
On 5/28/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patch looks good to me, though I'd recommend putting a versioned
build dependency on libxul-dev.
Ah, yes. I should have done that in the first place.
BTW, do you think it's a good idea to retain build-dep on firefox-dev?
Was it intended fo
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:40:26PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required
> >> c
On 5/9/07, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required
> changes to configure.in to detect xulrunner-plugin and remove
> MOZILLA_LIBS from the LDFLAGS.
I had done ex
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:00:12PM -0700, David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the
> > plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd
> >
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the
> plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd
> had to first check in what directory they all look for plugins. It would
> be a good idea t
On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required
changes to configure.in to detect xulrunner-plugin and remove
MOZILLA_LIBS from the LDFLAGS.
I had done exactly that before getting back to the package's
current approach, exc
It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the
plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd
had to first check in what directory they all look for plugins. It would
be a good idea to check whether konqueror can use it, too, in which case
it would be
9 matches
Mail list logo
