Bug#419261: What about creating a new section 'ruby' ?

2007-04-14 Thread Vincent Fourmond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: ftp.debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, A quick look into the interpreters section [in sid] shows that ruby packages make up nearly half of it: 22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection interpreter | wc

Bug#419261: What about creating a new section 'ruby' ?

2007-04-16 Thread David Moreno Garza
Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hello, > > A quick look into the interpreters section [in sid] shows that ruby > packages make up nearly half of it: > > 22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection > interpreter | wc > 411 8229366 > 22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptava

Bug#419261: What about creating a new section 'ruby' ?

2007-04-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/04/07 at 11:53 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > [..] > > What about creating a 'ruby' section, then ? > > [..] > > I strongly second this proposals. I second this as well. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [E

Bug#419261: What about creating a new section 'ruby' ?

2007-04-18 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hello, I want to second this proposal. There were several discussions to request this already back in 2004, but we never came around to actually filing the request. Since then, Ruby-in-Debian has grown a lot, with as shining example the Debian/Ruby Extras team which contributes over 150 pkgs to