On Don, 03 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Or `texlive'?
> > Depends: texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-recommended,
> > texlive-latex-base
> >
> > which is reasonable.
>
> Yes and no. texlive is a user-oriented, what I was thinking of is
> something Build-dep-oriented. It might be the
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wonder whether we should think of gathering information about a
>> potential "texlive-builddep" package. While there are reasons that
>> collection-latexbase does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that
>> build-depend on TeX will need them, a
On Mit, 02 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > ! I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
>
> That's an interesting one: It used only texlive-latex-base as
> Build-Dep. It's already fixed by adding tl-latex-recommended, I hope it
> works this time.
Should.
> (Hint: This wouldn't have happened if all package
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 421919 builddep-tetex-ftbfs
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Relevant parts:
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)kpathsea: Running mktextfm
> ecrm1095
> mktextfm: Running mf-
Package: fiaif
Version: 1.21.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000 rebuild
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex
5 matches
Mail list logo