Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't doubt that not getting stuck maintaining 5 versions of libdb4 in
> lenny (db4.2, db4.3, db4.4, db4.5, and the not-yet-released db4.6) is
> more important to them than an application-specific performance issue
> with db4.5.
It's not that bad. d
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:26:52PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > Is performance the only problem with 4.4 and 4.5 for OpenLDAP? If so, I
> > think the BDB maintainers would be well within their rights to ask for
> > removal of 4.2 from unstable anyway, even if 4.6 weren't on the horizon.
--On Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:22 PM -0700 Steve Langasek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:14:10PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:08 PM -0700 Steve Langasek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, if there are problems, better that they be d
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:14:10PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:08 PM -0700 Steve Langasek
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, if there are problems, better that they be detected at the
> > beginning of the release cycle when it's easier to get any upstre
4 matches
Mail list logo
