Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2008-06-09 Thread Philipp Kern
severity 422085 serious thanks Bastian, On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:23:50AM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote: Again, I don't see which part of the policy rng is violating. So downgrading the bug again back to wishlist. You are violating common sense. It's fine if you don't want to work on this

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2008-06-09 Thread Bastian Venthur
Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:23:50AM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote: Again, I don't see which part of the policy rng is violating. So downgrading the bug again back to wishlist. You are violating common sense. It's fine if you don't want to work on this bug, but please keep

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2008-06-07 Thread Philipp Kern
severity 422085 serious thanks Hi there, On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:47:54AM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote: 1. I *personally* hated that some packages sent a *huge* amount of 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2007-12-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:47:14AM +, David Nusinow wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: Since I received a terrifying amount insults(!) via mail for not implementing this feature request after my last blog entry, where I asked for help developing rng,

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2007-12-18 Thread Bastian Venthur
On 18.12.2007 03:47 schrieb David Nusinow: On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: Why was I opposed to implement this. 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj text, which I doubt anyone reads anyway. Since I don't want rng to be

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2007-12-18 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote: I haven't implemented presubj text in my patch, so this is a non-issue for that specifically. Yes, but I've merged this bug with a similar one where the reporter wanted rng to support presubj. And presubj is the most important thing here

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2007-12-18 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote: 1. I *personally* hated that some packages sent a *huge* amount of 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal* 4. I was *personally* very annoyed by

Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2007-12-17 Thread David Nusinow
Hi Bastian, On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: David Nusinow wrote: Hi Bastian, On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:39:03PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: Hi David, thanks for your effort and the patches. Personally, I don't like the idea of a terminal popping